Those Pre Roe Numbers - again!
Well since number crunching is not my real speciality and since somebody
has already done the work why repeat the process?
I'm indebted to Margaret Sykes of About Com for this excellent analysis.
Speaking of Beckwith and his essay "The Myth of Back Alley Abortions"
Sykes says:
But wait a minute! The whole point of this Beckwith essay is that illegal
abortion was safe, mostly performed by physicians and hardly riskier
than today. But, you see, this puts "pro-lifers" in a serious bind.
If abortion was very, very safe, then there were many, many
abortions. And if abortion was rare, then it was
very, very dangerous. It cannot be true that
illegal abortion was both safe and rare. Here
is the equation:
Number of abortion-related deaths (ND)
|
= Mortality risk (MR)
|
Number of abortions (NA)
|
|
As you can easily see, because ND is a known constant,
when NA is small, MR must become correspondingly big, and conversely when
MR is small, NA must be big. Both cannot be small.
Example: It's 1960. ND = *250. Let's make MR 50 times larger
than today (a woman was 50 times more likely to die than now). Since
MR now is 0.3/100,000, that would be 15/100,000. Then, solving for
NA:
[* That's Beckwith's number - E]
or NA = (250)(100,000)/15 = 1,666,666 abortions
1.67 million abortions per year in 1960?
If not, then abortion must have been even more dangerous.
But this guessing isn't necessary, because
we actually know the mortality rate from abortion in the 1950s and 60s:
it was about 20 to 25 deaths per 100,000 procedures from both legal and
illegal abortion. ("Pro-lifers" are absolutely correct in saying that illegal
abortion was not much more risky than legal abortion in those years; the
greater risk from an illegal procedure was offset by the fact that women
having legal procedures were sicker than women having illegal ones.
I will cite the references for this at the end.) So, solving for NA
is easy:
NA = (250)(100,000)/25 = 1,000,000
[editorial note: we can also deduce
from this that the actual risk was about 75 times todays risk - E]
And that's how we know that there were
about a million abortions a year in the two decades before legalization.
Since we also know the number of legal abortions, less than 10,000
a year, we know the number of illegal abortions by simple subtraction.
Quoting Beckwith:
"Fourth, it is misleading to say that
pre-Roe illegal abortions were performed by 'back-alley butchers' with rusty
coat hangers. While president of Planned Parenthood, Dr. Mary Calderone pointed
out in a 1960 American Journal of Health article that Dr. Kinsey showed in
1958 that 84% to 87% of all illegal abortions were performed by licensed
physicians in good standing. Dr. Calderone herself concluded that '90% of
all illegal abortions are presently done by physicians.'"
That's right. And that's how we have a good estimate of the
risk of illegal abortion, and how we know that there were about one million
abortions a year. Interestingly enough, while "pro-lifers" like to
cite Mary Calderone, they never mention that she also estimated one million
abortions a year in the same article.
Example of dishonesty: writing that without admitting that Mary Calderone
also estimated 1,000,000 illegal abortions per year in the very same article.
(It's dishonest to present Calderone as an authority on illegal abortion
when you don't also present other half of her claim.)
Planned Parenthood held its conference on abortion in 1955. At that
time the laws were so repressive that the conference was held in semi-secret
and was not publicized. This was not an unnecessary precaution. Medical
and public-health professionals met at the conference which moved PP in a
new direction under its courageous medical director, Dr. Mary Calderone.
The organization promised to keep the event quiet and told participants that
they would be quoted only with their permission and could have their "participation
deleted" from the published proceedings. As Leslie Reagan points out
in _When Abortion was a Crime,_ being associated with abortion in any way
was dangerous.
In spite of this, the conference participants accomplished a great deal.
One of the accomplishments was the statistical committee which came up with
the estimates of the number of criminal abortions. It is this figure
which is quoted in the NEJM article and in many others at the time and later.
But, as the JAMA article shows, this was not the only statistical estimate.
Besides the sources quoted in JAMA, there was also Christopher Tietze's estimate
that "prior to the adoption of more moderate abortion laws in 1967, there
were 1 million abortions annually nationwide, of which 8000 were legal, resulting
in an abortion rate of 5 per 1000 people and an abortion ratio of 30 per 100
live births." This citation of Tietze comes from the Council on Scientific
Affairs of the American Medical Association in their article "Induced termination
of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade," published in JAMA December 9, 1992.
You will find the "200,000 to 1,000,000" figure from the PP conference in
many medical articles, but Tietze's 1 million per year is now considered most
accurate. (Tietze C. "Abortion on request: its consequences for
population trends and public health," Sem Psychiatry 1970;2:375-381.)
Now, here is the story on the decline in abortion-related mortality and
how legalizing abortion saved women's lives.
This article is must-reading for anyone interested in the topic of illegal
abortion:
"Legalized abortion: Effect on national trends of maternal and abortion-related
mortality (1940 through 1976)." Cates W Jr, Rochat RW, Grimes DA,
Tyler CW Jr
The authors found that pregnancy
and childbirth-related deaths declined from 1940 to 1976 at an average annual
rate of 13% per year before 1956 and 5% per year after that. However,
the abortion mortality ratio went through three phases: a steady decline from
1940 to 1950 at an average annual rate of 18%, reflecting the use of antibiotics
and other advances in medical care; then a leveling off between 1951 and
1965 at an average annual decrease of only 1.8%; and then a suddenly improving
decrease of 11% a year between 1966 and 1970 followed
by a decrease of **25% a year between 1970 and 1976.
As I already said - why re-invent the wheel?
Thank You Margaret.
Oh and just to clean this up - for those claiming that the lower figure of
200,000 illegal abortions annually was the actual number in the 1950 and
1960 timeframe here's the previous formula using that 200,000figure.
Number of abortion-related
deaths (ND) - 250
|
= Mortality
risk (MR) 125
|
Number of abortions
(NA) 100,000
|
|
or MR =
(250)(100,000)/MR = 200,000 which gives us 125 for MR.
This would mean that one out of every eight hundred abortions resulted in
the death of the woman, a rate about three times the rate in sub Sahara Africa today according to WHO , (note their MR is based on live births)
yet they are claiming competent physicians were performing these abortions.
So this is the bind the current anti abortion movement finds itself
in. Were the two decades pre Roe times of few abortions with horrendous
risks or were there a large number of abortions with moderate risk. Did
Roe simply replace illegal abortions with legal ones and the demographic
of 'Boomers' reaching child bearing years increase those numbers for
a while or was there a sudden rush to abort pregnancies.
The statistics quoted in JAMA December 9, 1992 are obviously the more
reliable ones. The number is ~1,000,000. Read that article before
responding.
Of course another poof that the number of abortions performed were the same pre and post Roe can be provided by looking at the birth records. If legalizing abortion suddenly increased the number of abortions the birth rate should have shown a balancing drop as pregnancies were now being terminated instead of being carried to term. But the records show it stayed the same. There was no sudden drop and in fact ligalizinf abortion had little effect at all on the birth rate. In fact as the recorded number of abortions was increasing the birth rate was also increasing. This information is also courtesy of Margaret sykes.
Year Births Birthrate
1973 3,136,965 14.9
1974 3,159,958 14.9
1975 3,144,198 14.8
1976 3,167,788 14.8
1977 3,326,632 15.4
1978 3,333,279 15.3
1979 3,494,398 15.9
1980 3,612,258 15.9
Ectopic pregnancies didn't spike after 1973, as they would have if hundreds of thousands more women were having pregnancies they would otherwise have prevented if abortion had stayed a crime in most states, and births/birth rates didn't drop precipitously either, as they would have if women were aborting hundreds of thousands of pregnancies they would otherwise have carried to term. So the only conclusion left is that legal abortions were replacing illegal ones.
Eileen
HOME
If you came here from an offsite
link just click BACK.
|